Loading
Please login to save to your favourites
The unravelling of the case for Mandatory Vaccination?

The unravelling of the case for Mandatory Vaccination?

Our Decision Too exists as an attempt to give a voice to the disempowered, a group to which everyone involved with ODT also belongs. The only power we have is to use logic and reason in the hope that decision-makers will be influenced by this scientific approach to problem-solving.

We have been helping Jenny Smith who faces the prospect of being prevented from completing her medical studies because she is not vaccinated against Covid, and this will be a legal requirement by April (unless reason can prevail).

There are many strands, of which these seem most significant:

1) The science is weak: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2022/jan/08/nhs-doctor-challenges-sajid-javid-over-covid-vaccination-rules . In fact the vaccination clearly does not prevent transmission and natural anti-body and T-cell immunity is far superior.

2) Thousands of staff face losing their jobs: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-59927306

3) Being double vaccinated appears to double your chances of being infected, and therefore infecting others: https://dailysceptic.org/2022/01/09/double-vaccinated-have-double-the-infection-rate-data-from-iceland-shows/

Given these facts, has the case for mandatory vaccination entirely unravelled? And will the government - and other nations' governments - rescind this proposed mandate?

It is proposed that there is no case for mandatory vaccination, scientifically, economically or ethically

Values Trends

Gender

Agreement
Disagreement